I am in a quandary: re-blog or re-post?
I am aware that re-blogging a post means that the original has not been altered whatsoever. The comment added is an explanation why it is re-blogged. (This is also way to make older posts more visible to new readers of the site.)
However, what if the original texts are re-written without changing the concept? Is that possible? Is that permissible?
I admit I re-wrote the post Challenge, which was first published last September. It was shorter and somewhat hastily written. I played with the idea of deleting the post and re-typing it (after revisions) as a new one. But, I elected to re-publish it as a scheduled post.
If this is not okay with you, who liked the original, please let me know. I will discontinue similar postings in the future. I will simply edit the posts and leave them where they are.
(I also have plans to add some kind of explanation to some of my short quotes under the Snippets sub page and transfer them to the Expounded sub page afterwards.)
Your comments mean a lot to me.
– o –
I will be back on Monday. Field work this weekend so I will be offline.
Have a great weekend, guys and gals!